The Single Best Strategy To Use For how to solve cases of business and corporate law
The Single Best Strategy To Use For how to solve cases of business and corporate law
Blog Article
nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair into the offender along with the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
The main objectives of police is to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and above all be certain regulation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the discovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this aspect for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Should the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only completed Should the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence along with the petitioner company responded to your allegations therefore they were well aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), and also the petitioners may perhaps search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of the laws, the legal system adheres for the doctrine of stare decisis
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the load presented to any reported judgment may rely on the reputation of both the reporter and also the judges.[seven]
The regulation as proven in previous court rulings; like common law, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually perfectly-settled that even though taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to evaluate the benefit of each of the suitable candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to this sort of eligible candidates who will be found for being most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded through the respondent department just to increase favor for the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part of your respondent department.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Pertaining to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice will not be served, the grievance petition is usually dismissed. This is because service from the grievance notice is a mandatory requirement along with a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation involves that a grievance notice be served about the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) When the organization is transprovincial.
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions will be the opinions that are filed about the day that the appellate court issues its decision and tend to be not the court's final opinion.
Summaries of cases that shape the lives of younger individuals, guaranteeing a deeper understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and enthusiasts alike.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, check here or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Criminal cases Inside the common law tradition, courts decide the law applicable to your case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. In contrast to most civil regulation systems, common legislation systems Stick to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their own previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lessen courts should make decisions constant with the previous decisions of higher courts.